PMU: short-term mobile protection
The Ukrainian Civil Protection Code defines a primary mobile shelter as a technical product, including block-modular formats, intended for short-term protection of people in an outdoor/location-based scenario. The legal definition specifies a period of up to 4 hours.
This makes PMU relevant to a particular protection scenario rather than a generic synonym for any modular shelter product.
PRU: a civil-protection protective structure
An anti-radiation shelter belongs to the civil-protection protective-structure system and is governed through a project and regulatory framework different from the PMU product category.
The current definition in Article 32 describes PRU as a non-hermetic protective structure, including structures built from modular or block-modular components, intended to provide the defined protection conditions for at least 48 hours.
The Code also establishes a specific rule for PRU with capacity up to 50 people: their design and construction use modular or block-modular structures that meet national standards, while the completed structure must comply with the applicable building-code requirements.
Different standards and project documents apply
- PMU: DSTU 9329:2025 is the dedicated national-standard reference;
- PRU design: DBN V.2.2-5:2023 and other applicable project requirements;
- modular protective structures can also require understanding the scope of DSTU 9195:2022;
- the final document set depends on the actual project category and solution.
Do not replace the required category only because another format is cheaper
A school, workplace, residential project or public location first needs its civil-protection requirement and project basis established. Only then can a project team determine whether a PMU, PRU or another format can satisfy part or all of the identified need.
Official sources and references
For design, procurement and compliance decisions, verify the current Ukrainian text and status of the applicable document. ShelterMetric uses the English pages as working explanations, not as unofficial substitute standards.
